Is using a street address, county, and state an effective way to describe a parcel of land?

Using a street address, county, and state to describe a parcel of land is not considered an effective method because it lacks sufficient detail for precise identification. While it may provide a general location, this approach can be too vague, especially in areas where multiple properties share similar addresses. For example, a street name could be common, and several parcels may exist within the same county and state.

For more accurate land identification, additional details such as a legal description, including lot and block numbers or metes and bounds, would be necessary. These identifiers provide a unique and exact reference to a specific piece of land, reducing the potential for confusion or errors, particularly in transactions or development planning. Thus, while the street address, county, and state provide some context, they do not offer the specificity that is often needed in real estate practices.